Aubameyang, the Gabonese striker who joined Marseille from Arsenal in January 2019, has been a controversial figure for the club since his arrival. Despite scoring 18 goals in his first season with the team, he struggled to find the back of the net consistently throughout the following campaign.
One of the key factors that have contributed to Aubameyang's inconsistent performance is his pass success rate. According to data analysis by Football Data预测, Aubameyang had a pass success rate of only 54% during his first season with Marseille, which was significantly lower than his career average of 66%. This low pass success rate has led to criticism of his playstyle and tactics employed by the coach.
However, it seems that the impact of Aubameyang's pass success rate on his overall performance may not be as significant as previously thought. In fact, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Sports Sciences, there is no clear evidence to suggest that high pass success rates lead to better performance on the pitch.
The study analyzed the pass success rates of 21 professional footballers over a period of three seasons and found that pass success rate did not correlate with their performances. Instead, the researchers focused on other variables such as passing accuracy, decision-making, and tactical awareness.
Furthermore, the study also revealed that players who perform well on the pitch often have high pass success rates, but this does not necessarily mean that they are passers themselves. The study suggests that pass success rate is just one aspect of a player's overall game, and that other factors such as technical ability, physical fitness, and mental toughness are equally important.
In conclusion, while Aubameyang's pass success rate may have played a role in his inconsistent performance at Marseille, it is unlikely to have had a significant impact on his overall game. The study suggests that pass success rate should be considered alongside other factors when evaluating a player's performance on the pitch, rather than being used as a sole indicator.